Next: love Berlin - if you ever ask for your opinion, then make it with you. Tempelhof Airport - well, who was interested somehow no one (certainly not the people of Berlin, the world public was already open Mouth there and wondered what in Berlin as an absurdity happened), then even more Media Spree.
It's not about whether a topic murder moderately exciting place, but rather that a democracy can only work out so if people are willing to use their rights.
I personally am not for religion as a compulsory subject. I personally would find a solution at the best that you can call me from "Religion and Ethics", if one makes the happy - in the very first of the basics of the Christian religion are taught. ALLEN. Regardless of whether they are Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, humanist, etc. These pupils. Christianity is the basis of our Western society - whether one likes it or not. And indeed, there are a lot of positive things to learn - from charity, honesty, violence, etc. In no case should the religion / ethics classes are prayed. Something has to happen outside of your school. After teaching the Christian foundations will come the turn of the world religions. And after this was also a mediation of the respective foundations, should have enough understanding and tolerance be present to discuss general ethical and moral issues jointly. And yes, it should be relevant to a dislocation core curriculum so that it is not perceived as unimportant Laber compartment.
because my solution is unfortunately not on sale - I will vote for Pro ethics. Although the framework of this subject I really do not like and very unetschlossen and larifari appears.
But I can not be sure that the students are separated in such an important subject - not in a time of intolerance between religions is increasing.
The ethics education was introduced in 2006 for the "honor killing" at the Berlin Turkish woman to young people from different backgrounds to provide space on ethical and moral issues to discuss. And I think this decision is important and right - even if if the ethics teaching me about its contents forth is not enough.
If the student is now the freedom to choose between professional ethics and various religious education (Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish and humanistic - I think) have, there's just no longer the objective possibility of joint discussion. And I would find fatal.
However bother me in the debate but one enormous: the role of the Berlin Senate, which launched an operation funded by taxpayers' money each campaign ethics. Have I misunderstood something - or should our politicians do not follow the will of the people? How can there be acceptable that the government (quite expensive - but that's with a debt capital in the two-digit Billion range then probably no difference) poster and advertising campaign AGAINST runs the popular will? Dear Pro ethicists - what you say regarding this? Certainly nice to get some way, so support from the government. But you can find the really democratic? Triggers not blame you on, this procedure is as unjust?
But - if you take a look at the recent prominent referendum raises: Media Spree and the Tempelhof airport ... Since the place was already quite well! This means that whenever the will of the people in Berlin suggests that the government is like the stern father with a threatening finger at the motto "Quod licet Jovi, non licet Bovi! You silly silly people with your small Berlin small Berlin citizen friends, you've created with anyone to whom you is not you grown! "
Especially when Tempelhof airport, I can still remember the poster campaigns, in which I anglotzte including a precarious mom with baby in her arms and said something like "We do not need the airport for the rich!" No, for the people should be the airport, maybe a nice park to be closed early as the airport with a terse dinner -. the people of Berlin was shut out only invited guests were the last of "The. mother of all airports look "Well planes taking off -.. and today is the airport so not for the people instead endorsed the fashion trade show Bread & Butter just a 10 year contract for audience a "tradeshow for selected brands" to present. Well, I hope the Präkariats mom is with this use of the airport be happier (although I am afraid that it is not part of the audience) ...
But back to Pro ethics. In fact, the Higher Administrative Court yesterday the ad campaign for the Senate prohibited
"The High Administrative Court has now clarified that the Senate not in advance of the referendum flyers and ads must be financed from public funds."
rightly.
also learn of the Berlin Senate must ensure that he can not afford ANYTHING. Although Mr Wowereit naturally clamored. Clearly, insight is something that Mr. Wowereit is fundamentally alien character.
And the claim that the ads in the Senate would have cost only 2 times 25,000 euros - but can anyone who is professional, laughing softly. Yes, may be that the switching cost of the ads 50.000 Euro. The Development of the campaign with all the bells and whistles - the cost without a doubt another 2 - 3 Euro
more :-) I would love to vote against the Berlin Senate. Very much. Is
me but unfortunately not possible. Los
, Berlin: Vote! No matter what your true: Your voice is needed!
0 comments:
Post a Comment